Crackdown on nuisance calls to make marketing companies display caller ID

Department for Culture, Media and Sport

January 12
09:30 2016

Direct marketing companies will have to display their telephone numbers under plans Government has set out in the bid to tackle the scourge of nuisance calls.

Unsolicited direct marketing calls can cause significant stress and anxiety, particularly to those people who rely on the telephone as their main means of keeping in touch with friends and loved ones. At best these calls are a source of irritation and at worst they can lead to people falling foul of scammers.

Research shows that around one in five live and automated direct marketing calls that were reported to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO) as a nuisance call did not provide valid caller ID.

The proposal to make it a requirement for direct marketing callers to provide valid Calling Line Identification (CLI) will deal with this problem head on. It will help:

  • improve consumer choice, by making it easier for people to refuse and report unwanted marketing calls; and
  • make it easier for the ICO to investigate and take enforcement action against callers that persistently and deliberately break the rules.

Companies found breaching the law by making nuisance calls can be fined up to 1/2 million depending on the type of calls and severity of the case.

Baroness Neville-Rolfe, Minister for data protection, said:

Being pestered by marketing calls is annoying at the best of times and at its worst it can bring real misery for the people on the receiving end. There is no simple solution to the problem of nuisance calls, but making direct marketing companies display their telephone number will help consumers and regulators take action.

Companies are already being financially punished when they blatantly flout the rules, and mandatory caller ID is just another step we are taking as part of a closely coordinated effort with regulators, industry and consumer groups to tackle the problem.

Over the past few years there has been a substantial rise in the number of concerns reported to the ICO about nuisance marketing calls and texts, with an increase of over 11 per cent in 2014/15 alone. Latest figures from consumer group Which? show:

  • three quarters (74 per cent) of people with a landline still receive unwanted calls in a month; and
  • calls to mobile phones have also been on the rise with seven in 10 (72 per cent) saying they had at least one nuisance call to their mobile in the space of a month, compared to more than half (55 per cent) in 2013.

This latest move is part of recent action from Government to tackle the issue. Government has already made it easier for the ICO to:

  • punish the companies making nuisance calls by removing the legal threshold for taking action; and
  • more effectively share information with the Ofcom in relation to nuisance calls.

Since January 2012, the ICO has issued fines totalling nearly 2m for serious cases of nuisance calls. In September 2015, Home Energy & Lifestyle Management Ltd (HELM) was fined 200,000 for making over six million nuisance calls as part of a massive automated call marketing campaign.

The six-week consultation closes on 23 February 2016 and following this, the Government plans to bring the measure into force in spring 2016.

More information

The ICO imposed more than 1m worth of penalties for nuisance calls and text messages in 2015, with the same amount in the pipeline for early 2016. Total fines from ICO in relation to nuisance marketing in 2015:

  • 400,000 fines for nuisance texts (Help Direct UK Ltd; Oxygen Ltd; UKMS Money Solutions Ltd)
  • 575,000 fines for nuisance calls (Direct Assist Ltd; Point One Marketing Ltd; Cold Call Elimination Ltd; Home Energy & Lifestyle Management Ltd (HELM); Nuisance Call Blocker Ltd; Telecom Protection Service Ltd)
  • 130,000 fine for selling customer records for marketing (Pharmacy 2U Ltd)
  • 30,000 fine for sending marketing email (Telegraph Media Group Ltd)

Related Articles


  1. We don't have any comments for this article yet. Why not join in and start a discussion.

Write a Comment

Your name:
Your email:

Post my comment

Recent Comments

Follow Us on Twitter

Share This

Enjoyed this? Why not share it with others if you've found it useful by using one of the tools below: