GovWire

Chapter 6: Declaration of priority

Intellectual Property Office

January 22
15:47 2025

class="gem-c-govspeak govuk-govspeak govuk-!-margin-bottom-0">

6.01

An applicant may seek to establish a priority date for an application in accordance with s.5 of the Patents Act 1977. The applicant must normally do this at the time of filing under rule 6(1). If the claim to priority is not made at the date of filing it may be made later under rule 6(2) providing all the conditions of that rule are met. See para. 6.15-6.20.

6.02

The normal period for claiming priority is 12 months from the filing of the earlier application. Exceptionally permission may be granted for a late declaration of priority to be made under s.5(2B). In this instance the time period is 14 months from the filing of the earlier application. See para. 6.21-35

6.03

Part 5 of F1 should be completed with the relevant information. The country and date of filing should be given at the date of filing and a period of 16 months is allowed for the earlier application number to be provided under r.8(1) otherwise the priority declaration will be disregarded. This period is extendable by a period of two months under the provisions of r.108(2). A further discretionary extension may be allowed under the provisions of r.108(3).

6.04

The declared priority may be in respect of one or more patent applications in one or more convention countries (Annex 6A - List of Convention Countries)

6.05

When carrying out the preliminary examination (see Chapter 7), the Formalities Examiner should check any declaration to ensure it does not exceed the 12 month period prescribed in s.5(2A). The only exceptions to this rule will be when a rule110 certificate is in force at the time of filing of the later application ([see Chapter 12]) or when a late declaration under s.5(2B) has been allowed.

6.06

If a defective declaration is discovered, the applicant should be notified that the priority date is invalid and that they must provide a corrected and valid date within 2 months of the notification otherwise the priority claim will be disregarded.

6.07

A priority claim cannot be based upon an earlier Design registration either in the UK or abroad. Any such claim should be rejected. However, the subject matter of a German gebrauchsmuster application, or an application for registration of a Utility Model, or a French Certificate of Utility may be considered a relevant application for the purposes of s.5(2).

6.08

A priority claim based upon a US Provisional application should not be objected to by the Formalities Examiner. Any questions with regard to the validity of such a claim to priority will be addressed when a challenge is made through the courts.

The right to claim priority

6.09

In order to make a claim to priority, the later application should have been made in the same name as the applicant of the earlier application, or by their successor in title (s.5(2)). Where the earlier application has more than one applicant then the later application must be made by all the applicants, or their successors in title. It is not sufficient to have one applicant in common (MOPP 5.19). To establish this connection, the Formalities Examiner must compare the applicants names on both cases.

6.10

Where there is no apparent connection, the Formalities Examiner should ensure that there is an explanation of the new applicants right to claim priority on the open part of the dossier by creating a minute annotated New Applicant. The applicant should also be informed that the right to claim priority may be open to challenge.

6.11

The derivation of right mentioned on the F7 may provide an explanation on how the new applicant derives the right to file the later application. Alternatively the information may be contained in a letter. Where there is no such indication on file, the Formalities Examiner must write to the applicant to obtain the required information.

6.12

A special letter has been prepared for this specific purpose and no other letter should be used. This letter is called (Annex 6B - LFL) and requests the applicant to provide an explanation of how they derive the right to claim priority. It also warns the applicant that the Comptroller may call for evidence to substantiate any statement given. The letter is retrievable via PROSE.

6.13

When the applicants response is received, the case should be referred to the Casework Lead to either endorse the priority claim, or request further information if required.

6.14

If (after a suitable reminder), the applicant does not respond, the declared priority date should remain in place for publication purposes. A file-note should be placed on the dossier to draw to the Patent Examiners attention to the fact that the validity of the priority date is in doubt. A letter should be issued to the applicant noting that the requested information has not been filed and that the substantive examiner may further assess the validity of the priority claim during prosecution of the application.

Late claims to priority under Rule 6(2)

6.15

A claim to priority may be added after an application has been filed provided that the priority date is within the 12 months prior to the filing date of the later application and the request is made in the prescribed manner and within the time limit.

6.16

The request must be made on a Form 3 (plus fee currently 40) and the applicant should complete Part 4(ii). The request must be made within 16 months of the earliest priority date claimed. There must not be a request for accelerated publication on the case and if such a request has been made it must be withdrawn before the PPC date. If there is more than one late claim only one form and fee is required.

6.17

If the above conditions are met then the request will be allowed, there is no requirement for evidence. This also applies to s.89 cases. If the request is filed outside the time limit the letter at Annex 6D (i) - Rule 6(2) request out of time should be issued.

6.18

On receipt of a F3 (type ii) the Formalities Examiner should check the status of the application and ensure it is not set to Formalities Complied With before referring it to the Casework Lead for COPS action.

The Casework Lead should record the new priority details using REC LAT and update the F1 to reflect the new priority details. The case should then be returned to the Formalities Examiner.

6.19

The agent/applicant should be notified of allowance using the letter at Annex 6D (ii) - Rule 6(2) request allowed. Any time periods which have already been calculated should then be amended and a further Preliminary Examination report issued where necessary. Standard Footnote 17 should be entered on COPS. The Patent Examiner should also be alerted to the change when necessary by a minute.

6.20

If by adding

Related Articles

Comments

  1. We don't have any comments for this article yet. Why not join in and start a discussion.

Write a Comment

Your name:
Your email:
Comments:

Post my comment

Recent Comments

Follow Us on Twitter

Share This


Enjoyed this? Why not share it with others if you've found it useful by using one of the tools below: