Speech: How we make public health fit for the future

Department Of Health

September 11
12:13 2019

Good morning.

What a wonderful theatre. Its refreshing to be in a building where everything works and everyone gets along.

They tell me that when the construction work here is completed, the new Warwick Arts Centre will have more space, more facilities, and be more accessible essentially it will be: bigger, better and fit for the future.

Today, Id like to talk to you about how we make public health fit for the future, what we need to do to build on our success and weve had some huge successes that should be celebrated but also the work we still need to do the challenges and opportunities of the next decade.

Because I believe the 2020s is going to herald a fundamental shift in how we think of health, especially public health: proactive, predictive, personalised prevention thats the future of public health.

And, Id like to start with the story of a great British victory against the odds dont worry this isnt about Brexit its the story behind Team GBs complete and utter domination of elite cycling.

Now, in 2002, the team had won just one solitary Olympic gold medal in its 76-year history.

But over the next decade, they won 8 gold medals at 3 Olympics they transformed British cycling from an international laughing stock to world leaders everyone wanted to imitate.

And they did it by the theory of marginal gains.

Team GB worked out that if you broke down all the constituent parts that go into elite cycling, if you can improve each one by just 1%, then add it all together: thats your margin of victory. Thats how you achieve success.

Now, I use this example because the whole story of public health is one of marginal gains.

Weve always been driven by the data. And we must continue to be driven by the data and make decisions based on evidence whether its on sugar, vaccination or opioids 3 things I will return to.

But the other reason I use the example of cycling is because public health is also made up of so many constituent parts: national government, local authorities, the NHS, employers, and, most importantly, individuals.

Of course, funding is important, and I will always fight for fair funding for health and social care, and I will always fight for local government, like I did in the Spending Round, because nobody knows your communities, and their needs, better than you.

But public health is about so much more than just the public health grant: its about the whole system working together, and travelling in the same direction.

Because the big stuff, the easier stuff, has been done: on smoking, on immunisation, on HIV even on clean air.

The only way forward is one of marginal gains, gradual improvements, hard-fought progress. So many of you have played a role in achieving these gains.

Thanks to our concerted efforts on smoking legislation and education we now have one of the lowest smoking rates in Europe.

50 years ago, 1 in 2 adults smoked. Now, less than 1 in 6 adults smoke in England.

Yet, for the 14% of adults who do still smoke, its the leading cause of illness and early death, and we know the less well-off you are, the more likely you are to smoke, exacerbating existing health inequalities.

So how do we get that 14% closer to zero?

Our prevention green paper has set an ambition for England to be smoke-free by 2030.

Ten years to get people to give up cigarettes or switch to less-harmful alternatives.

Its a big ask, but Im confident we can do it through a proactive approach to prevent young people from taking up smoking, and through personalised support to help persistent smokers kick the habit.

Personalised prevention: this must be the guiding principle of public health in the 2020s.

And to achieve it we must harness the predictive power of genomics, and the data-crunching power of AI so we can get to people before they have a problem, so we can prevent bad luck or bad choices leading to bad outcomes.

Thats the reason were going to review the NHS Health Check programme, not to scrap it or remove it, but to see how we can improve it, how we can use tech and data to target people more effectively. There has long been a debate about whether this programme is good value for money and what we are saying with this review is that we want to look at making sure the money we do spend is better targeted.

Now, of course, when it comes to clean air, thats a global challenge that requires a global response, and the UK has taken a global lead with the Clean Air Strategy we launched earlier this year: an ambitious, 25-year, cross-government plan to improve our health by improving our environment.

But when it comes to the other 2 big public health challenges of the next decade obesity and mental health then personalisation, more targeted interventions and more tailored support is how we achieve those marginal gains.

Its how we succeed in our goal to help people live healthier, happier lives.

And this is how we do it: starting in childhood actually even before a child is born, genomics and AI can help us diagnose and treat rare diseases while they are still in the womb, so they are born healthy.

We use predictive prevention to reach the parents who need help with infant feeding and nutrition.

We use opt-in data from smart devices and wearables to identify which children need more help with physical activity, which children may be at risk of mental health problems.

I know sometimes it sounds like I think technology and data is all that matters. But it only matters because we care about people. Better data and smarter tech can help us get to them faster, but tech cant replace people. Face to face, human interventions will always be the most effective way to help young people, particularly with those children not lucky enough to be born into safe and loving homes.

To give every child the best possible start in life we need to fundamentally change the way we think about health its not a problem to patch up when things go wrong. Its an asset, a foundation to build on, something to protect and nurture, something society must invest in for every child along with good housing, a strong economy, and well-paid work, because good health is what makes everything else in life possible.

When we have it, we take it for granted. But when we dont

As Health Secretary, Ive met with many parents of seriously ill children and its clear theres nothing more painful than seeing your child in pain. But whats also at the forefront of those parents minds is all the opportunities their child is going to miss out on as they grow up all the normal things we take for granted.

If we can prevent ill health, if we can promote good health, then we give every child the chance to fulfil their potential in life.

That must be our goal.

That is both the challenge and the opportunity we face in public health over the next decade.

So strong action to take excess calories, salt and sugar out of our childrens diets like the successful sugar levy on soft drinks has done.

Strong action against manufacturers and advertisers so they cant bombard young brains with junk food messages.

Tough action against social media companies and tech firms to remove suicide and self-harm content, and tackle the spread of anti-vaccination propaganda.

And even tougher action to stop Britains opioid crisis becoming any worse and I dont use that word lightly. When 1 in 10 adults in England are on opioids, thats a crisis.

Of course, painkillers have an important role to play, but the first duty of public health must be to protect the public.

We cant afford to be complacent. Weve all seen the devastation opioids have caused in Americas heartland.

We can not let that happen here. It is our job to prevent this problem from escalating.

So Im extremely grateful for the PHE inquiry. Your recommendations, your evidence on painkillers and anti-depressants will inform the actions we take to tackle this head-on.

The report published this week was very important and will mark a milestone in the attitude we take to over-medicalisation. The report was assured and based on evidence but also clear so that the public can understand. It backs up our own anecdotal evidence that there is a problem that must be tackled, and tackle it we will.

So all of those things taken together childrens diets, social media harms, anti-vax, opioids should and are being led by national government, but thats not going to be enough.

We cant tax and legislate our way out of childhood obesity.

We certainly cant tax and legislate away the mental health problems our young people face.

Theyre part of the armoury, yes, but theyre not a silver bullet.

Because at the heart of it were talking about changing human behaviour. And if you want to change the way people act, then you need to understand the way people think.

The Department of Health and Social Care has polled people across the country on prevention, from all age groups, from all backgrounds, so we can understand what the great British public think, and what they expect from us.

And there were 2, clear, overriding messages:

  1. the overwhelming majority of people believe the responsibility for their health lies with them the individual, not the state. I think this is a good thing and should underpin our approach we must do more to empo

Related Articles


  1. We don't have any comments for this article yet. Why not join in and start a discussion.

Write a Comment

Your name:
Your email:

Post my comment

Recent Comments

Follow Us on Twitter

Share This

Enjoyed this? Why not share it with others if you've found it useful by using one of the tools below: