GovWire

Speech: How we build an NHS thatís there for every member of society

Department Of Health

October 9
12:45 2019

This feels familiar: it seems like it was only a week ago I was on a stage in Manchester making a speech about the biggest hospital building programme in a generation Im assuming you all saw it?

Well, if you didnt, one of the highlights of my last trip was going to North Manchester General Hospital with the Prime Minister to see one of the 40 hospitals were building or upgrading over the next decade.

We met with Raj Jain (CEO) and his brilliant leadership team, and we met with some of the patients being cared for by the brilliant doctors and nurses there.

But as we were looking around, it became abundantly clear that those facilities, built in 1876, arent fit for the modern age. Its like one of the staff there said: asking Premiership footballers to play on a ploughed field.

All I can say: its a good job Solskjaer isnt running an NHS trust or Man United would be in special measures by now.

But poor facilities are not something that you should have to accept for your teams.

The right leadership is so important to the health of the NHS, but whats even more important is that our NHS leaders have the right support.

That youre not trying to operate with one arm tied behind your back.

As health secretary, Ive listened to you about what support you need to do your jobs, and what Ive seen is that the best chief execs, with the best-run trusts, all talk in the long term.

Of course, we all face short-term challenges, day-to-day pressures, but good leadership is about looking ahead, being able to anticipate and plan, think about the resources, the changes and innovation that youre going to need to meet the demands of tomorrow.

One of the most pressing demands is for more people and that is what most of the 33.9 billion extra funding will be spent on.

There will be more on that in the People Plan later this year. Today, Id like to talk about 3 other things that are going to be integral to the future of every NHS trust: the Long Term Plan, capital and tech.

And Id like to take a moment to focus on each one.

First: the Long Term Plan Bill.

Simon Stevens, and his team, have consulted with you, and colleagues from across the NHS, to develop proposals collaboratively for an LTP Bill.

We want any legislative changes to have widespread support, and to ensure they help speed up delivery of the plan.

At their heart, the proposals, which Im considering carefully, will empower you to work collaboratively with other providers and commissioners, so you can reduce bureaucracy and procurement costs, and so we can improve care and get the best possible return for taxpayers.

The proposals set out how the NHS is moving from competition to collaboration as the main driver for service improvement.

So more joint working. Choice for patients must remain, and competition should be encouraged where it can lead to better outcomes, but it doesnt have to be done in a bureaucratic, crass way. It isnt the organising principle for NHS services.

On mergers: trusts need to be able to make merger decisions in the best interests of patients and patient interest should be clearly defined.

But the Competition and Markets Authority merger review process adds an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy thats time consuming and costly with knock-on effects for staff and patients.

So the proposals recognise that while the CMA has an important public interest role to play, when it comes to things like pharmaceutical pricing, proposed trust mergers are better assessed by the NHS.

Theyre better placed because quality of care, and best use of NHS resources, should be the guiding principles when it comes to deciding on mergers, tariff-setting and licence conditions.

And on tariffs, the Long Term Plan sets out how were moving away from activity-based payments to population-based payments.

Why?

Because we need more flexibility to spur innovation and to remove perverse incentives. Were already doing it with blended payments for emergency care and multi-year tariff setting, but we can go much, much further.

Fair, transparent, locally-set prices will make it easier to redesign care across providers, support preventative care models and reduce transaction costs.

And on procurement, you know there are too many complexities and costs with little added value for patients in return.

So we hear what youre telling us and its clear: we need simpler, more refined procurement, that reduces bureaucracy when youre developing competitive tender bids, that makes it easier for you to work with commissioners to develop innovative clinical models.

And this new procurement model should cover commissioning of all healthcare services not just arrangements with NHS statutory providers.

So, we hear you, the voices of the NHS.

Second: lets talk capital.

Last week, here in Manchester, we launched the Health Infrastructure Plan: the biggest, boldest hospital building programme in a generation, properly funded not painful PFI deals and properly planned so the NHS is ready for the 2020s and beyond.

Now, you all know the topline figures: 6 new hospitals, ready-to-go now, will start immediately, and another 34 new hospitals, in the pipeline, have been given the green-light, and seed funding, to develop their plans.

But the Health Infrastructure Plan (HIP) isnt just about building new hospitals: its about capital to modernise diagnostics and tech, modernise our primary care and mental health buildings, and help address critical safety issues in the NHS.

Its about the capital system as a whole.

You know better than anyone the challenges we face that capital is too stop-start, the disjoint between the national allocation and local decisions, and the last-minute nature of some approvals.

This new regime will provide indicative, multi-year planning envelopes that will be confirmed annually.

To balance control and delivery, were proposing 2 sets of changes: one, to offer more assistance to providers in developing their business cases, and 2, to streamline the approvals process.

To ensure that funding reaches the frontline as soon, and as efficiently, as possible, all national organisations will need to work together more closely to manage NHS capital expenditure, through greater budget transparency and improved forecasting.

Under this new system, providers will remain responsible for maintaining their estates, and for setting and delivering their organisations capital investment plans. But local providers must work much more collaboratively to plan capital investment. After all, if one trust breaches capital spending limits, then clearly thats going to have a knock-on effect on others and their capital plans: we all share the same national pot.

Integrated care systems (ICS) will have primary responsibility for spending within their capital envelopes covering both types of acute trusts, mental health trusts, community trusts, primary care and of course linking in with ambulance and specialist trusts.

I want to see more capital and estates collaboration through ICSs. I want to see providers who think they can better use local assets currently owned by NHS Property Services (NHSPS) to take over these assets and used them for the very best of the local health system. Weve seen some early examples of use of the new powers for trusts to request ownership of NHSPS assets starting in my own patch with Newmarket Hospital. And I will in principle be open to all such transfers, within the accommodative rules weve set out.

Trusts need to think of their physical assets as working for the ICS, and ICSs need to work to make the most of all the assets there are locally, and everyone needs to focus on using our physical assets to bolster the most important asset: the health of the population who we serve.

That is the new vision and I need you to help me make it a reality.

The role of regions will be advisory: to support ICSs with advice to deliver their plans, to ensure ICSs in turn work with each other, and to make the relationship between the centre and local systems tractable.

And then we need more integration at a national level too. There will be one capital sign-off nationally: a Capital Committee including NHS England, NHS Improvement and DHSC. I want the national sign-off to be spectacularly more straightforward. We will be guardians of the national capital expenditure limits, and strategic in allocations of central capital, and encourage planning for the future through the HIP process. But the bureaucracy around sign-offs will be radically simplified.

The system must be fair to everyone: NHS trusts and foundation trusts alike.

We want to make sure capital better flows to where its most urgently needed, while still rewarding trusts for strong financial performance, preserving the autonomy trusts have while ensuring the whole system uses capital as strategically as possible.

Its about building a more equitable, fairer system, where every constituent part of the NHS lives up to its responsibilities by acting in a collaborative way and that, collectively, we all act in the best interests of patients and taxpayers.

And I want to say a word about what I mean by integration. This isnt superficial. I want trusts to be bold when it comes to integration.

Its very easy to point at real or perceived barriers and say: lets just do the bare minimum.

Primary care, community care, mental health and adult social care should all be looking at ways, including stru

Related Articles

Comments

  1. We don't have any comments for this article yet. Why not join in and start a discussion.

Write a Comment

Your name:
Your email:
Comments:

Post my comment

Recent Comments

Follow Us on Twitter

Share This


Enjoyed this? Why not share it with others if you've found it useful by using one of the tools below: