Competition Markets Authority
|27 December 2018||Statutory deadline for CMA response|
|19 December 2018||CMA response to super-complaint published|
|28 September 2018||Super-complaint from Citizens Advice received|
Loyalty penalty update: 12 months on
This update sets out the work and progress that has been made 12 months after our investigation into the loyalty penalty.
Loyalty penalty update: getting better and fairer deals
Last year the CMA responded to concerns raised by Citizens Advice in a super-complaint about the loyalty penalty. This update sets out the work and progress that has been made following our investigation.
18 June 2019: The secretary of state has responded to the CMAs recommendations to regulators and government.
- Government response (18.6.19)
Loyalty Penalty Working Group
Following the publication of the CMAs response to the loyalty penalty super-complaint, the CMA has set up a working group to oversee the implementation of recommendations made by the CMA. It is chaired by the CMA and its members include representatives from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Ofcom, Ofgem, the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), HM Treasury (HMT) and the UK Regulators Network (UKRN).
An update on progress will be published in summer 2019.
Response to super-complaint
19 December 2018: The CMA has responded to a super-complaint by Citizens Advice, which raised concerns that not enough has been done to tackle the loyalty penalty being paid by longstanding customers in five markets: mobile; broadband; cash savings; home insurance and mortgages.
We have set out a package of reforms, both across markets and specifically in relation to the five markets identified by Citizens Advice. We believe these will achieve real changes and help existing customers get a fair deal.
We have also launched investigations in the anti-virus software market, as a first step in a wider programme of enforcement in this area.
We will provide an update on our progress to the Consumer Forum in six months. An update will also be published on our website.
- Executive summary (19.12.18)
- Press release: CMA tackles loyalty penalty charges (19.12.18)
Summary of super-complaint
The CMA received a super-complaint from Citizens Advice raising concerns about long term customers paying more for goods and services, which it refers to as the loyalty penalty. Citizens Advice has identified five key markets where it has concerns about the loyalty penalty, covering telecoms and financial services. These are: mobile, broadband, savings accounts, mortgages and household insurance.
- Citizen Advices loyalty penalty super-complaint (28.9.18)
- Press release: CMA to investigate loyalty penalty super-complaint (28.9.18)
What is a super-complaint?
The Enterprise Act 2002 (the Act) makes provision for designated consumer bodies to make super-complaints. A super-complaint, as defined by section 11(1) of the Act, is a complaint submitted by a designated consumer body that any feature, or combination of features, of a market in the United Kingdom for goods or services is or appears to be significantly harming the interests of consumers. Citizens Advice is a designated consumer body. Within 90 days after the day on which a super-complaint is received, the CMA must say publicly how it proposes to deal with it.
Sabrina Basran, Project Manager at the CMA explains how a super-complaint works
More information about what super-complaints are available in our short guide. Information on the process and who can make super-complaints can be found in our guidance How consumer bodies can make super-complaints.
How to give your views - now closed
Our invitation to comment has now closed. The deadline for submitting evidence to the CMA was 14 October 2018. We sought responses to the following questions:
- What are your views on the existence, impact and root causes of a loyalty penalty for consumers across markets; including the five identified by Citizens Advice (mobile, broadband, savings accounts, home insurance and mortgages) and any others?
- Are there circumstances in which you think a loyalty penalty is not problematic at all or where it is particularly problematic, and if so why?
- What specific additional challenges do vulnerable consumers experience and should there be additional protections?
- What measures to tackle any loyalty penalty should be considered, including those suggested by Citizens Advice and any others? Please explain how these measures would effectively address the problem.