GovWire

Consultation outcome: Appropriate clinical negligence cover

Department Of Health

December 15
14:00 2022

Feedback received

Detail of feedback received

The publication of responses was delayed to enable consideration alongside the findings of the 2020 Paterson inquiry. The governments response to the Paterson inquiry committed to publishing this summary in 2022. We are grateful to all those who contributed.

This consultation sought views on 2 options regarding appropriate clinical cover for regulated healthcare professionals:

  1. To leave arrangements as they currently are (thereby permitting discretionary indemnity cover to remain in the market without regulatory oversight).
  2. To change legislation to ensure that all healthcare professionals not covered by a state-backed indemnity scheme hold appropriate clinical cover that is subject to appropriate supervision in the case of UK insurers by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority.

The governments preferred option (subject to the outcome of the consultation) was option 2. However, the consultation recognised that there could be difficulties arising from a move to regulated products, including in any transition. The consultation also asked a range of further questions on related issues.

The consultation generated 101 responses. The majority of respondents who answered the question were in support of the governments preferred option 2. Overall, it was recognised that this would bring additional costs, but the majority of respondents said that the perceived benefits (including greater consumer confidence, increased transparency for healthcare professionals, and greater security and certainty of cover) would outweigh these costs.

Next steps

In December 2021, the government set out next steps on appropriate clinical negligence cover in its response to recommendation 10 of the Paterson inquiry report. We continue to work closely with stakeholders on these issues, taking account of the responses to this consultation along with wider evidence we are collecting.

The government will provide further updates on these issues in its wider progress reporting against the recommendations in the Paterson inquiry implementation update.

Original consultation

Summary

Seeking views about indemnity cover for healthcare professionals who are not covered by any existing or proposed state-backed scheme.

This consultation ran from
to

Consultation description

This consultation is about indemnity cover for healthcare professionals who purchase their own indemnity cover because they are not covered by existing or proposed state-backed schemes.

It seeks views on 2 options:

  1. Leave arrangements as they are.
  2. Change legislation to require healthcare professionals who are not covered by any state-backed scheme to hold cover that is regulated.

Currently, all healthcare professionals who wish to practise in the UK are legally required to hold appropriate clinical negligence cover for the costs of claims and damages awarded to patients arising out of negligence.

There are concerns that the current arrangements held by healthcare professionals who are not covered by state-backed schemes could prevent patients getting appropriate compensation and put healthcare professionals at risk of being personally liable for the costs of claims.

This is because these arrangements are mostly discretionary, where the providers are not contractually obliged to meet the costs of any claim and are not subject to prudential or financial conduct regulation.

The groups that are likely to be most affected by any changes to the current indemnity arrangements are:

  • regulated professionals in the NHS who hold indemnity cover which is not currently regulated, such as primary care dentistry
  • private practice of medical doctors and other regulated healthcare professionals
  • healthcare professionals in Northern Ireland and Scotland who are not covered by any state-backed indemnity scheme, such as GPs

Documents

Related Articles

Comments

  1. We don't have any comments for this article yet. Why not join in and start a discussion.

Write a Comment

Your name:
Your email:
Comments:

Post my comment

Recent Comments

Follow Us on Twitter

Share This


Enjoyed this? Why not share it with others if you've found it useful by using one of the tools below: